Van Gogh’s ‘Starry Night’ obeys a scientific law that was invented 52 years later. It reveals the painter’s keen observations of nature.

“The issue concerning ‘The Starry Night’ is whether its depicted flowing sky mirrors reality,” Huang said. To figure that out, Huang and his colleagues examined 14 swirls in a high-resolution image of “The Starry Night.”

Based on the swirls’ size and the distance between them, the researchers determined that they adhered incredibly closely to Kolmogorov’s turbulence theory.

In 1941 — 52 years after van Gogh painted “The Starry Night” — mathematician Andrey N. Kolmogorov proposed a formula to explain how the kinetic energy of a vigorously moving fluid flowed from larger eddies, or circular currents, to smaller ones.

“Turbulent flows are a frequent occurrence in everyday life,” Huang said. You can see turbulence in action in a flowing river, your gushing faucet, or moving clouds.

While churning water may seem chaotic, its swirls follow patterns, which mathematical equations — like Kolmogorov’s — can help explain.

Of course, van Gogh didn’t use these equations, since they didn’t exist while he was alive. But the fact that “The Starry Night” resembles turbulent activity so accurately is a testament to the painter’s keen observation of nature.

Even his brushstrokes in the masterpiece seemed to fit with a different law related to turbulence, called Batchelor scaling, which describes the way turbulence mixes fluids.

The researchers found that van Gogh’s tiny brushstroke eddies followed patterns they would expect to see from particles swirling together in a fluid.

Van Gogh captured at least one element of turbulence

Van Gogh painted “The Starry Night” in 1889 while he was recuperating in an asylum in southern France where he voluntarily checked in after mutilating his left ear.

Van Gogh sketched the views he saw from his room’s window and painted in the asylum’s garden and a makeshift studio. He completed about 150 paintings during his yearlong stay.

Not everything in “The Starry Night” looks exactly as he would have seen it. For example, there was no village outside his window.

Yet there’s one part of the painting that van Gogh wouldn’t have been able to create without turbulence: the bright object near the horizon, which is likely Venus.

Its position low on the hills and bright, white color make Barnard astronomer Janna Levin think van Gogh saw the planet in the night sky. “There’s no star, besides our sun, close enough to look like anything but a twinkle,” she told The BBC’s “The Way I See It” podcast in 2019.

“The only reason it twinkles is because of the turbulent air,” she added. “The turbulent air is usually so invisible to us except for that it makes the stars twinkle.”